-Joy Behar: Wah Wah Racism blah blah Black Friday whine Great White Guilt etc.

The Great White Guilt strikes again! At least Whoopi makes the comment at the end that "no one would have thought of that if you hadn't said it JOY." Hmm... Whoopi Goldberg displaying common sense? Maybe this is the end of the world...

But alas, it wasn't meant to be... Whoopi went back to her usually whining about how white people have kept her down.

Goldberg: Oh, hello and welcome to ‘The View.’ Today is Black Friday, all day long. And I’m going to stay black all day because of it. 


Behar: Isn’t it a little racist to call it Black Friday? 


Goldberg: Well, I would have called it African American Friday, but that’s taking something away from it.


Behar: But there’s a negative connotation to it? Or does it mean something else?


Goldberg: No, it’s like when you make all the money – you’re in the black. 


Behar: So it’s positive? 


Goldberg: Yeah. It’s in the black, so it’s a huge great thing. 


Behar: A lot of times, like blackmail is negative, black sheep.


Goldberg: Black people. 


Behar: No, not black people. 


Goldberg: But it used to be, it used to be.

So very profound Whoopi!

And here we see Joy making up for the evils of the white race by being cordial to an African-American:



h/t IHatetheMedia

-Jimmy Carter, the real racist?

-GUEST POST: Racism, Liberals, and the Dysfunctional Media

If you find yourself disagreeing with President Obama, or any liberal policy for that matter, then you are a racist. Whether you know it or not, you are unconsciously a racist. That is what I learned today from a woman who called on the Ed Shultz show 99.9 FM. She stated that “Anyone who disagrees with a public option, foreign policy, or don’t want their children listen to President Obama’s speech to students is a racist…they can not hide beneath kind words, they may not know it, but they are racist.”

Why does that make a person a racist? Is it sole because they disagree with a minorities view? Minorities always find a way to shut down any opposing view: they pull the race card. At the beginning of Barack Obama’s campaign for the presidency I was swayed by then Senator Obama’s charismatic speeches. Then as I did more research into his policies, I found many policies and plans he would enact if elected that I did not agree with. Over the course of the campaign I found myself being called a racist because I would not vote for Obama. I would engage initially in a friendly debate and ask “Why do you support Senator Obama?” Many responses I received included “He represents change” or “He is such a cool guy.” When I attempted to engage in a debate about his policies and revealed that I disagreed with them, I was immediately accused of being a racist. I disagree with the majority of President Obama’s policies, but I am not a racist. The only race I see is the Human race. A racist would vote for an individual sole on race…as many of the individuals who voted for Senator Obama did. There was a 90% increase in minority voters from the previous election to this one. To them, I am a racist because I disagreed with his policies and the direction he would take our country ….Interesting.

Another statement that drives me crazy that liberals love to use is “How could you not support a public option, or welfare, don’t you want to help out your fellow Americans.” Well of course I want to help out fellow Americans. Anyone who reaches into his own pocket to help out a fellow citizen should be applauded. However it if I was to reach into the pocket of a neighbor and take money to give to the homeless man down the street, I would be arrested for theft. That is essentially what the government is doing and will do with programs such as welfare and a public option.

I WANT THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY POCKET

~Barrett Mays

-America's Nation Parks: The new racist hotspots, according to ABC

Newsflash! The President is black, and won pretty handily. And political correctness aside, has anyone stopped to consider that black people may be *gasp* different than white people? Maybe black people don't want to visit a national park. Maybe white people generally like uppity activities like that. It's okay to speak in generalities when they are on point.

-Idiot MSNBC analyst poses the illuminating question: is "socialist" becoming the new "n-word"?

What utter nonsense. For a guy who mentions "birthers", a group of people he and his cohorts have routinely bashed for being an outrageous group of conspiracy theorists, he sure is bold to suggest a conspiracy theory that is completely illegitimate and with zero basis in fact in order to stir up a pot of bulls***.



Congratulations MSNBC. You continually show what a classy, government-run media group you truly are.

-Gates, Crowley, Obama Beer Summit

A picture speaks a thousand words:

-Video: So Racist!!

-This is why you need the RaceCard

via IOwntheWorld

-Black teen mob attacks white family on Fourth of July

Equal rights for one group, race, or religion means equal rights for all, not just for those that it is chique to support in these days of political correctness that we are living in. Read the below story and try to imagine media/political reaction would be if the races and roles were flipped.

Akron police say they aren't ready to call it a hate crime or a gang initiation.

But to Marty Marshall, his wife and two kids, it seems pretty clear.

It came after a family night of celebrating America and freedom with a fireworks show at Firestone Stadium. Marshall, his family and two friends were gathered outside a friend's home in South Akron.

Out of nowhere, the six were attacked by dozens of teenage boys, who shouted ''This is our world'' and ''This is a black world'' as they confronted Marshall and his family.

The Marshalls, who are white, say the crowd of teens who attacked them and two friends June 27 on Girard Street numbered close to 50. The teens were all black.

''This was almost like being a terrorist act,'' Marshall said. ''And we allow this to go on in our neighborhoods?''

They said it started when one teen, without any words or warning, blindsided and assaulted Marshall's friend as he stood outside with the others.

When Marshall, 39, jumped in, he found himself being attacked by the growing group of teens.

His daughter, Rachel, 15, who weighs about 90 pounds, tried to come to his rescue. The teens pushed her to the ground.

Akron police are investigating. Right now, the case is not being classified as a racial hate crime. There were no other reports of victims assaulted by the group that night.

The department's gang unit is involved in the investigation, police said.

''We don't know if it's a known gang, or just a group of kids,'' police Lt. Rick Edwards said.

The Marshalls say they fear retaliation at home or when they go outside. They are considering arming themselves, but they're concerned about the possible problems that come with guns.

For now, they are hoping police can bring them suspects. They believe they can identify several of the attackers.

''This makes you think about your freedom,'' Marshall said. ''In all reality, where is your freedom when you have this going on?''(emphasis mine)

Now, imagine for a second that it was a group of white teens, shouting white supremacist phrases, attacked a black family on the Fourth of July. An equally heinous crime, of course, as it should be. HOWEVER, the media would play it up and Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and much of the black community would be in an uproar. This is partly because the African-American community has such a strong sense of family and community. Nothing wrong with that. But white folk are too afraid to stand up and say that it is wrong, that if you ARE going to have "hate crimes" and "hate crime legislation" at all, then this is surely a hate crime. They are afraid of repercussions, and many whites are self-righteous and cowardly when it comes to issues of race. The media would be the worst culprit, and the police department, probably for the same reasons listed above.




h/t Tony M

-Black Republicans petition Obama for an apology for years of segregation, racism

Here's something you won't hear on MSNBC. The National Black Republican Association is calling on the Democratic Party to apologize for being "the party of four S's: Slavery Secession Segregation and now Socialism." Haha. Nobody realizes that it was DEMOCRATS not Republicans who did these things. The REPUBLICANS freed the slaves. But Republicans are old white guys so they're racist right?

From The Examiner via Bluegrass Pundit

The National Black Republican Association (NBRA) has issued a petition requesting President Obama to issue a proclamation of apology to black Americans for the Democrat Party’s 150-year history of racism in America. The organization’s current newsletter, “The Democratic Party Owes Blacks an Apology” by Chairman Frances Rice, outlines the reasons for the petition.

The NBRA is not asking this of our government, our country, American citizens, nor the Republican Party. They are asking it solely from the Democrat Party. Further, they ask Democrats to stop “issuing unwarranted apologies on behalf of America, while simultaneously using racial politics for partisan political gain.”

The organization places the blame for current racial divides in America at the feet of the Democrat Party. In the newsletter, they contend the Democrat Party is “the party of the four S’s: Slavery, Secession, Segregation, and now Socialism.”

They believe the socialist policies of the Democrat Party harm blacks, rather than help them, and serve to further racial tensions through victim-mongering.

-Diversity in the Naval Academy means different race, different standards.

From American Renaissance News:

The Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead announced in Annapolis recently that "diversity is the number one priority" at the Naval Academy.

The Naval Academy superintendent, Vice Adm. Jeffrey Fowler, echoed him. Everyone understands that "diversity" here means nonwhite skins.

Here's how they filter out whites in favor of less qualified nonwhites:

White applicants out of high school who are not also athletic recruits typically need grades of A and B and minimum SAT scores of 600 on each part for the Board to vote them "qualified." Athletics and leadership also count.

A vote of "qualified" for a white applicant doesn't mean s/he's coming, only that he or she can compete to win the "slate" of up to 10 nominations that (most typically) a Congress(wo)man draws up. That means that nine "qualified" white applicants are rejected. SAT scores below 600 or C grades almost always produce a vote of "not qualified" for white applicants.

Not so for an applicant who self-identifies as one of the minorities who are our "number one priority." For them, another set of rules apply. Their cases are briefed separately to the board, and SAT scores to the mid-500s with quite a few Cs in classes (and no visible athletics or leadership) typically produce a vote of "qualified" for them, with direct admission to Annapolis. They're in, and are given a pro forma nomination to make it legit.

Minority applicants with scores and grades down to the 300s with Cs and Ds (and no particular leadership or athletics) also come, though after a remedial year at our taxpayer-supported remedial school, the Naval Academy Preparatory School.

By using NAPS as a feeder, we've virtually eliminated all competition for "diverse" candidates: in theory they have to get a C average at NAPS to come to USNA, but this is regularly re-negotiated.

If we truly want to end the discrimination against minorities, why do we give them special treatment and privileges? Acts like this only prolongs it and amplifies that discrimination and separation based on race and ethnicity.




Thanks to Moonbattery

-CNN: Where Dreams are Made

Here's some CNN for you!



The truth is told about Sotomayor and CNN's Rick Sanchez tries to shout over it.

-Obama makes another gaffe while presenting his racist Supreme Court nominee

President Obama in another display of his brilliant oratory prowess has demonstrated his lack of knowledge about the Constitution that he has so readily shredded.

This was all during his presenting his new nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor is a Hispanic woman, which apparently was one of the qualifications for being an empathetic judge according to Barack Obama. At a 2002 speech in Berkeley California, Sotomayor made this statement:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

That is a textbook definition of racism. But minorities cannot be racist right?

-Things aren't always as they seem...

Old, but funny.



Via Ihatethemedia

-Garofalo Embarrasses Herself

If I were a liberal, I would be embarrassed to say Janeane Garofalo shared my ideology.



There were people of all colors and of all political affiliations there Janeane. Maybe they weren't protesting spending the last eight years because they recognized that we were fighting two wars, and that Bush's spending was essentially one third of what Obama has pushed through, with no way to make it up in time for our children to not have to sell their souls to Big Government. And for the record "Whatcha talkin' 'bout Willis" is the best sign of racism at the tea parties that she could think of? Give me a break, and lighten up. For the very large majority of these protesters, it's not about Obama's skin color. It's about the frightening prospect of a huge government and a enormous debt that is being built up for the generations to come.

The sad part for Janeane is that she has a lot more notoriety from her hate speech about "rednecks" than for any "entertaining" she has ever attempted to do.


Poor thing...

-BET Calls Limbaugh a Racist

In an article written by the BET.com staff, conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh is said to have "a problem with leading black Republicans." The article cites two examples, one being Republican party chairman Michael Steele's little tiff with Rush, the one is the more recent attacks on Rush by former Secretary of State and "Republican" General Colin Powell.

Yeah, Limbaugh has a problem with leading black Republicans because they aren't conservative or, in Powell's case, Republican by anything but name. There is no doubt Powell is a great American and has done much for this country, but he is doing nothing for the Republican party. Steele started out promising enough, but has quickly digressed into the media and liberal appeasing Republican that plagues the party and who does not have what it takes to challenge Barack Obama. On anything.

"I think what Rush does as an entertainer diminishes the party and intrudes or inserts into our public life a kind of nastiness that we would be better to do without," Powell said.Is there anything really wrong with responding to the attacks made by both Steele and Powell? Maybe if the Republican party stuck to the conservative values of limited government, free market capitalism, and upholding the Constitution, Rush would not have to point out their faults all the time.

BET.com used the following quote as apparent evidence of Rush's racism. "He's just mad at me because I'm the one person in the country who had the guts to explain his endorsement of Obama," Limbaugh said. "It was purely and solely based on race." I happen to think the reason Powell endorsed Obama and completely turned his back on his own party is because he hold liberal ideologies, and Rush also believes that.

The problem with all these claims is that Rush often praises Clarence Thomas, the second ever African-American Supreme Court judge. Thomas held conservative values, and he believed in the Constitution and while on the bench he upheld it, and Rush mentions him often. In addition to this, Dr. Walter Williams, also black, often has guest appearances on the show. This goes to show that Rush does not have a problem with black people, just fake Republicans. Limbaugh has never attacked anyone for being black, or for promoting a black person to a position of power just because they were black. If he had, he likely would not be on the air anymore. Ask Don Imus.

It's not always about race, BET, stop making it so. Open your minds, right?



Source: Newsbusters