-UN's ridiculous climate change summit in Copenhagen opens with ridiculous video

Are you kidding me? If this isn't fear mongering and propaganda, I don't know what is.



This is basically 2012 shortened down to five minutes... How long are we going to blind ourselves to this garbage, and continue to ignore facts?\

Source: Wired

-Pay a tree for its sacrifice of absorbing your nasty carbon footprint

Just one of those stories... oh how far we have fallen.

Designer Nitipak Samsen has designed the Automated Tree-Rental for Emission Encaging Machine (ATREEM), which essentially allows you to purchase carbon credits from a tree. The gadget measures the growth of a tree, translating into how much carbon dioxide the tree has absorbed. The gadget is designed to highlight just how long it takes for our carbon dioxide emissions to be reabsorbed.

The device is more about awareness than being a practical method for charging people for their carbon dioxide emissions. However, the gadget is capable of charging credit cards using its swipe-card interface.



Source: Moonbattery

-Global Warming! Save the polar bears!

This commercial from WWF will make you sick.



Here's the problem with this nonsense. It's not getting warmer, and the polar bear population is increasing. Also, polar bears enjoy the delicacy of human flesh. And is it just me, or is this no name about to break out in laughter throughout the commercial?

h/t Moonbattery

-Quote of the Day: Tom Schelling in interview with The Atlantic tells the truth behind promoting false global warming hyseria

"It’s a tough sell. And probably you have to find ways to exaggerate the threat. And you can in fact find ways to make the threat serious... But I tend to be rather pessimistic. I sometimes wish that we could have, over the next five or ten years, a lot of horrid things happening — you know, like tornadoes in the Midwest and so forth — that would get people very concerned about climate change. But I don’t think that’s going to happen."

~Tom Schelling, Nobel prize winning economist, in The Atlantic magazine in an interview about "climate change"

h/t Climate Change Fraud

-Al Gore: Lite on the Carbon, Heavy on the Carbs

-Attention craving windbag Al Gore compares fight against global warming to the fight against the Nazis

Al Gore again tried to make people believe him once again about his self-made and highly profitable hoax. Pretty despicable to compare this money grubbing global warming joke to the liberation of the entire European continent from Nazi Germany. Not only that, but is Gore comparing himself to the great Winston Churchill? Not only is he lying to us but he's lying to himself as well. His fellow global warming hysteria promoters at The Times had this to say as well:

Al Gore invoked the spirit of Winston Churchill yesterday when he urged political leaders to follow the example of Britain's wartime leader in the battle against climate change.

The former US Vice-President accused governments around the world of exploiting ignorance about the dangers of global warming to avoid taking difficult decisions.

Speaking in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by The Times, Mr Gore said: "Winston Churchill aroused this nation in heroic fashion to save civilisation in World War Two. We have everything we need except political will, but political will is a renewable resource."

Here's Fox News reporting on our pal the Goracle: (If anyone can find another network reporting on this, let us know)

-Al Gore's brainchild bill requires you to spend thousands before you can even put your home on the market

More and more heinous facts will come out of this travesty of a bill in the coming days. These are going to be facts that 90 percent of our Congressmen did not hear about before their vote. We can only hope that the Senate does the right thing and not vote for this environazi, massive tax bill.

From CNSNews via Gateway Pundit:

The 1,400-page cap-and-trade legislation pushed through by House Democrats contains a new federal policy that residential, commercial, and government buildings be retrofitted to increase energy efficiency, leaving it up to the states to figure out exactly how to do that.

This means that homeowners, for example, could be required to retrofit their homes to meet federal “green” guidelines in order to sell their homes, if the cap-and-trade bill becomes law.

The bill, which now goes to the Senate, directs the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop and implement a national policy for residential and commercial buildings. The purpose of such a strategy – known as the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) – would be to “facilitate” the retrofitting of existing buildings nationwide.

“The Administrator shall develop and implement, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, standards for a national energy and environmental building retrofit policy for single-family and multi-family residences,” the bill reads.

It continues: “The purpose of the REEP program is to facilitate the retrofitting of existing buildings across the United States.”

The bill leaves the definition of a retrofit and the details of the REEP program up to the EPA. However, states are responsible for ensuring that the government’s plans are carried out, whatever the final details may entail.

“States shall maintain responsibility for meeting the standards and requirements of the REEP program,” the bill says.

As if selling your home wasn't going to be hard enough in this economy, now you have to spend an extra few thousand dollars to appease the EPA and Democrats and some Republicans who care only about getting reelected.

-Quote of the Day: Jim Boehner on Cap and Trade Bill

When asked why he took an hour to read portions of the bill aloud on the floor of the House prior to the vote, Boehner said, “Hey, people deserve to know what’s in this pile of shit.”

He's right. The House actually voted on (and passed) an outline. And a 300 page amendment, which was added at three in the morning of the day it was voted on. What happened to transparency Pelosi and Obama?

The outline doesn't even show how they're going to accomplish all of the things they want to. The only given is that they're going to raise taxes and destroy energy corporations to do it.



Here's a copy of the bill...ah, transparency. Good luck. To really get the full feel of this agenda, read about how the EPA suppressed a skeptical global warming report the day before the vote at NewsBusters.

Here's a lovely visual of just how much this bill could cost the American taxpayer if this travesty passes the Senate.

-Weather Channel founder on Fox News recognizes the 30,000 scientists debunking global warming; considers suing Al Gore

John Coleman, Weather Channel founder and 30,000 other scientists are considering a lawsuit against Al Gore. Why are 30,000 scientists completely ignored and laughed at by the mainstream media and by liberals who don't bother to do research? Not to mention the Republicans who just go along with it. Even if half of those 30,000 are illegitimate sources, that is just too many to be ignored, and the fact that they are is a travesty and it against the values of free speech written into the Constitution and what this nation was founded upon.

-Global Warming deniers should be killed?

Talking Points Memo, a website often used by liberals in the media as a reference, recently had the post below removed.

At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers?

What is so frustrating about these fools is that they are the politicians and greedy bastards who don’t want a cut in their profits who use bogus science or the lowest scientists in the gene pool who will distort data for a few bucks. The vast majority of the scientific minds in the World agree and understand it’s a very serious problem that can do an untold amount of damage to life on Earth.

So when the right wing f***tards have caused it to be too late to fix the problem, and we start seeing the devastating consequences and we start seeing end of the World type events - how will we punish those responsible. It will be too late. So shouldn’t we start punishing them now?

Even if the concept of global warming as portrayed by the media wasn't a complete farce, what happened to freedom of speech? Why should someone be killed simply because they disagree with what is thought to be "the majority?" (It isn't.)



Source: StoptheACLU

-Al Gore Can't Save All the Polar Bears

-Al Gore worth $100,000,000 thanks to fear-mongering

Since he left office in 2001, Al Gore has gone from being worth two million to one hundred million dollars. Check out Laura Ingraham on the subject:



Source: Planet Gore