-Probable Terrorists on Tuesday Detroit Flight

From MyFoxDetroit:

A flight from Amsterdam into Detroit Metropolitan Airport was held on the tarmac after landing because of unruly behavior by some of the passengers.

The source says four men from Saudi Arabia were saying something in Arabic that alarmed four on-board Federal Air Marshals. The Marshals speak Arabic. A decision was made to stop the plane on the tarmac away from the passenger terminal and remove the men from the plane.

Once the men were removed, the rest of passengers were then taken to the terminal for deboarding.

The Transportation Security Administration says the unruly passengers were interviewed by Customs and Border Protection officials.

But the TSA says the passengers were released and no arrests were made.

It's okay, we can just let them go and be on their merry way. Don't these TSA idiots realize that terrorists from MIDDLE EASTERN countries run test runs on these flights, in preparation for any possible attack? I suppose they are just taking after Obama: Don't address it, don't acknowledge it, and definitely don't do anything to stop it.



Source: Creeping Sharia

-Yale Press removed Muhammad cartoon from a book about...Mohammed cartoons

This is hilarious. And pathetic. Or Orwellian.

From the New York Times:

Yale University and Yale University Press consulted two dozen authorities, including diplomats and experts on Islam and counterterrorism, and the recommendation was unanimous: The book, “The Cartoons That Shook the World,” should not include the 12 Danish drawings that originally appeared in September 2005. What’s more, they suggested that the Yale press also refrain from publishing any other illustrations of the prophet that were to be included, specifically, a drawing for a children’s book; an Ottoman print; and a sketch by the 19th-century artist Gustave Doré of Muhammad being tormented in Hell, an episode from Dante’s “Inferno” that has been depicted by Botticelli, Blake, Rodin and Dalí…

John Donatich, the director of Yale University Press, said by telephone that the decision was difficult, but the recommendation to withdraw the images, including the historical ones of Muhammad, was “overwhelming and unanimous.” The cartoons are freely available on the Internet and can be accurately described in words, Mr. Donatich said, so reprinting them could be interpreted easily as gratuitous.

He noted that he had been involved in publishing other controversial books — like “The King Never Smiles” by Paul M. Handley, a recent unauthorized biography of Thailand’s current monarch — and “I’ve never blinked.” But, he said, “when it came between that and blood on my hands, there was no question.”

Oh we're so "progressive" and "culturally sensitive"! Give me a break. Want to see one of the offfending cartoons? Well, we will be so bold as to publish one, at the risk of death threats.


h/t Hot Air

-Member of Ahmadinejad & Supreme Leader Khamenei's Iranian Basiji militia interviewed about raping young girls before their execution

Why are we reaching out to these people, this regime? This is Islam, this is Sharia law. The below article is disturbing.

From "'I wed Iranian girls before execution'," by Sabina Amidi in the Jerusalem Post:

In a shocking and unprecedented interview, directly exposing the inhumanity of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's religious regime in Iran, a serving member of the paramilitary Basiji militia has told this reporter of his role in suppressing opposition street protests in recent weeks.

He has also detailed aspects of his earlier service in the force, including his enforced participation in the rape of young Iranian girls prior to their execution.

Founded by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 as a "people's militia," the volunteer Basiji force is subordinate to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and intensely loyal to Khomeini's successor, Khamenei.

The Basiji member, who is married with children, spoke soon after his release by the Iranian authorities from detention. He had been held for the "crime" of having set free two Iranian teenagers - a 13-year-old boy and a 15-year-old girl - who had been arrested during the disturbances that have followed the disputed June presidential elections.

"There have been many other police and members of the security forces arrested because they have shown leniency toward the protesters out on the streets, or released them from custody without consulting our superiors," he said.

...

"Fourteen and 15-year old boys are given so much power, which I am sorry to say they have abused," he said. "These kids do anything they please - forcing people to empty out their wallets, taking whatever they want from stores without paying, and touching young women inappropriately. The girls are so frightened that they remain quiet and let them do what they want."

These youngsters, and other "plainclothes vigilantes," were committing most of the crimes in the names of the regime, he said.

Asked about his own role in the brutal crackdowns on the protesters, whether he had been beaten demonstrators and whether he regretted his actions, he answered evasively.

"I did not attack any of the rioters - and even if I had, it is my duty to follow orders," he began. "I don't have any regrets," he went on, "except for when I worked as a prison guard during my adolescence." [...]

He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so "impressed my superiors" that, at 18, "I was given the 'honor' to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death."

In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a "wedding" ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard - essentially raped by her "husband."

"I regret that, even though the marriages were legal," he said.

Why the regret, if the marriages were "legal?"

"Because," he went on, "I could tell that the girls were more afraid of their 'wedding' night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression; it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.

"I remember hearing them cry and scream after [the rape] was over," he said. "I will never forget how this one girl clawed at her own face and neck with her finger nails afterwards. She had deep scratches all over her."

Returning to the events of the last few weeks, and his decision to set free the two teenage detainees, he said he "honestly" did not know why he had released them, a decision that led to his own arrest, "but I think it was because they were so young. They looked like children and I knew what would happen to them if they weren't released."

He said that while a man is deemed "responsible for his own actions at 13, for a woman it is 9," and that it was freeing the 15-year-old girl that "really got me in trouble. ..."



h/t Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs

-Afghanistan, bastion of liberal progressivity, now allows men to rape their wives and starve them if they do not give their consent.

This is the government that our boys are over there fighting and dying for to give complete control to? Where are the women's rights activists? The ACLU? Afghan President Hamid Karzai signed legislation which among other things, allows Afghan men to starve their wives if they refuse to have sex with them. The measure was an amendment to a law that was ALREADY IN THE BOOKS in which husbands have the right to force themselves on their wives, if they do not consent.

From the Norfolk Crime Examiner via Stop the ACLU

Some NATO countries have threatened to withdraw their troops from Afghanistan as a result of the measure.

Speaking to British newspaper The Independent, women’s rights activist Wazhma Frough said that hard line clerics pressured the Justice Ministry to retain the most outrageous parts of the original legislation. She said: “There have been a few little changes, but they are not enough. For example, if the wife doesn’t accept her husband’s sexual requirements then he can deny her food.”

Afghanistan’s Muslim law now allows rapists to go free if they offer to marry their victims. The same practice actually exists in Mexico and is known as ‘Rapto.’

The new law has touched-off riots in the streets of Kabul, as hundreds of women protested the law which would be unthinkable in a civilized society. However, groups of men from Kabul’s largest Shia madrassa also took to the streets and attacked the women. The event has been completely ignored by the American press.

Oh but the Muslim religion is so misunderstood and misrepresented in the media... Really? It seems clear. Oh course, this law has its basis in Sharia Law, which, if many Middle Eastern Muslims had their way, would be the only law of land.

-Egypt rules that its citizens cannot be married to Israelis

From JewishJournal:

After the verdict was read in the Cairo courtroom, Nabih al-Wahsh, an Egyptian attorney, jumped for joy and received an avalanche of telephone calls from friends congratulating him on his latest legal victory. Al-Wahsh has managed to extract a ruling from Egypt’s Administrative Court — which rules in disputes between citizens and the state — that would force the Egyptian government to strip Egyptians married to Israelis of their Egyptian citizenship. The May 19 ruling was met with the cheers of millions in this populous Arab country. “This is an historic ruling,” al-Wahsh said to reporters after the ruling. “Egyptians married to Israelis are dangerous to Egypt’s national security, acting in ways that contradict the constitution of their country and Islamic laws,” he said.
This is the same country that President Obama called "the heart of the Arab world"

The problem with the Muslim world is that we as westerners or as Israelis must tolerate them, but they have to tolerate no one. It's no surprise you won't be hearing about this in the mainstream media. It would be quite embarrassing for President Obama.

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009

-Germany being taken over by Islam

Islamic groups want Germany to live under Sharia Law, according to the secret service's yearly report released by Interior Minister.

Maybe these governments will finally realize and acknowledge the goal of Islamic Jihad: a one-world Islamic state. But it will be too late before they make a move to stop it.

From Bild.com via JihadWatch:

Increasing numbers of Islamic fundamentalists - mostly second generation immigrants and radical converts - are travelling from Germany to Pakistan to visit terror camps run by al-Qaeda and other similar groups.

German interests at home and abroad are in danger. The report reveals that Germany is an 'immediate target' for Islamist terror groups.

-Free Speech Under Attack at Purdue

Just another instance of free speech coming under attack. Nonie Darwish, a woman who escaped Sharia Law in the Middle East after living there for 47 years, came to Purdue University. The students there showed her true American hospitality by expressing their believe in the freedom of speech for radicals only. These kids seemed to think they knew more about Sharia Law than a woman who was born and raised in Egypt and Gaza for nearly 50 years knew.



Source: CreepingSharia via IHatetheMedia